CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Emzoom vs Kia Stonic
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Emzoom vs Kia Stonic

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACKia
Price (RRP)$25,590$26,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power125kW88kW
0-100 km/h7.8s11.2s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space341L352L
Towing900kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the GAC Emzoom & Kia Stonic

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the Kia Stonic opens at $26,990. That makes the GAC Emzoom the more affordable entry point by $1,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $29,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Kia Stonic by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Kia Stonic gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Kia Stonic. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Kia Stonic offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom and 1-zone in the Kia Stonic.

Drivetrain

The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 125kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Kia Stonic responds with a Petrol making 88kW and 172Nm, paired to a 7-speed dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.2 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 88kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 3.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 245mm longer than the Kia Stonic at 4,165mm (2,580mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 352L in the Kia Stonic, giving the Kia Stonic a 11L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.2m

TightestKia Stonic STightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Stonic S
10.4mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Stonic S
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia StonicTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
GAC Emzoom11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Kia StonicTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $1,425/year for the Kia Stonic. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Kia Stonic.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (GAC Emzoom) vs $1,425 (Kia Stonic). The Kia Stonic saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Stonic). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Stonic if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The GAC Emzoom and Kia Stonic trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Kia Stonic will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and Kia Stonic?

The GAC Emzoom is the cheapest at $25,590 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia Stonic by $1,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Stonic uses the least fuel at 5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of GAC Emzoom and Kia Stonic carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Stonic has the largest boot at 352L.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs