CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BYD Atto 2 DM-i vs GAC Emzoom
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Atto 2 DM-i vs GAC Emzoom

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Specifications in progress

BYD Atto 2 DM-i: not on sale yet, so BYD hasn't published warranty and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBYDGAC
Price (RRP)$24,990$25,590
Fuel typePlug-in HybridPetrol
Range (WLTP)39km—
Battery7.9 kWh—
Electric range39km—
Power122kW130kW
0-100 km/h9.1s7.8s
Fuel Economy5.1 kWh/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot (seats up)425L341L
Towing750kg—
Warranty—7yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYesNo

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the BYD Atto 2 DM-i & GAC Emzoom

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i starts from $24,990 before on-road costs, while the GAC Emzoom opens at $25,590. That makes the BYD Atto 2 DM-i the more affordable entry point by $600.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $27,489 and $28,149 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Atto 2 DM-i by roughly $8,180 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

BYD Atto 2 DM-i

None open on our record

GAC Emzoom

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

7.9kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i features a 10.1-inch touchscreen, while the GAC Emzoom gets a 14.6-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the GAC Emzoom. The GAC Emzoom counters with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol producing 122kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom responds with a Petrol Turbo making 130kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 130kW vs 122kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the GAC Emzoom is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i measures 4,330mm long on a 2,620mm wheelbase, 80mm shorter than the GAC Emzoom at 4,410mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 425L in the BYD Atto 2 DM-i and 341L in the GAC Emzoom, giving the BYD Atto 2 DM-i a 84L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestBYD Atto 2 DM-i ActiveTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BYD Atto 2 DM-i Active
10.6mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
BYD Atto 2 DM-i Active
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBYD Atto 2 DM-iTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
BYD Atto 2 DM-iTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
GAC Emzoom11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $245/year for the BYD Atto 2 DM-i and $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom. That is a $1,636 annual difference in favour of the BYD Atto 2 DM-i.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Atto 2 DM-i if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

GAC Emzoom: Top CarSorted Score, 65 vs 61

The GAC Emzoom comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (65 vs 61), taking 2 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 24), reliability (GAC Emzoom ahead by 16), safety (GAC Emzoom ahead by 15). The BYD Atto 2 DM-i will save you roughly $1,636 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 2 DM-i has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 2 DM-i and GAC Emzoom?

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i is the cheapest at $24,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $600.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses the least fuel at 5.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BYD Atto 2 DM-i and GAC Emzoom carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BYD Atto 2 DM-i has the largest boot at 425L with the seats up (1,335L with the seats folded).

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 130kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs