Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs GAC Emzoom
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
From $27,500
SUV
Hybrid
Petrol I4 + HEV
150kW
5.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
470L
GAC Emzoom
From $25,590
SUV
Petrol
Petrol Turbo
125kW
6.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
341L
Track the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid & GAC Emzoom
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the GAC Emzoom opens at $25,590. That makes the GAC Emzoom the more affordable entry point by $1,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $28,149 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GAC Emzoom gets a 14.6-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GAC Emzoom counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the GAC Emzoom offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The GAC Emzoom responds with a Petrol Turbo making 125kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 2.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 80mm shorter than the GAC Emzoom at 4,410mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 341L in the GAC Emzoom, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 129L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.2m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,881 (GAC Emzoom). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and GAC Emzoom?
The GAC Emzoom is the cheapest at $25,590 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by $1,910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and GAC Emzoom carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 470L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid makes the most power at 150kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
