GAC Emzoom vs GWM Haval Jolion
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval Jolion opens at $23,990. That makes the GWM Haval Jolion the more affordable entry point by $1,600.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $26,389 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GAC Emzoom by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GAC Emzoom and GWM Haval Jolion hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Emzoom packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the GWM Haval Jolion.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GAC Emzoom and 6 in the GWM Haval Jolion.
Feature Showdown
The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval Jolion gets a 10.3-inch display and 3.5-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that you will not find on the GWM Haval Jolion. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the GWM Haval Jolion offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom and 1-zone in the GWM Haval Jolion.
Drivetrain
The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 125kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.
The GWM Haval Jolion responds with a Petrol making 105kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 62mm shorter than the GWM Haval Jolion at 4,472mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval Jolion generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 400L in the GWM Haval Jolion, giving the GWM Haval Jolion a 59L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 12.0m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $2,309/year for the GWM Haval Jolion. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.
Estimated annual total: $1,881 (GAC Emzoom) vs $2,309 (GWM Haval Jolion). The GAC Emzoom saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval Jolion). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Haval Jolion if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The GAC Emzoom and GWM Haval Jolion trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval Jolion has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and GWM Haval Jolion?
The GWM Haval Jolion is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $1,600.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GAC Emzoom and GWM Haval Jolion all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval Jolion has the largest boot at 400L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval Jolion has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!












