CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Haval Jolion vs Mazda CX-3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval Jolion vs Mazda CX-3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMMazda
Price (RRP)$23,990$27,800
Power105kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.5s10.9s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space400L350L
Towing1,500kg1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Haval Jolion starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the GWM Haval Jolion the more affordable entry point by $3,810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $30,580 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Haval Jolion and Mazda CX-3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval Jolion and 99% for the Mazda CX-3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval Jolion packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda CX-3.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval Jolion and 6 in the Mazda CX-3.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval Jolion features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-3 gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval Jolion stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-3. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval Jolion uses a Petrol producing 105kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval Jolion is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval Jolion measures 4,472mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 197mm longer than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval Jolion generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the GWM Haval Jolion and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the GWM Haval Jolion a 50L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval Jolion leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval Jolion Premium
12.0m
Worst
GWM Haval Jolion
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-3
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the GWM Haval Jolion and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval Jolion.

Estimated annual total: $1,682 (GWM Haval Jolion) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The GWM Haval Jolion saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval Jolion) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The GWM Haval Jolion has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval Jolion if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval Jolion takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval Jolion will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval Jolion has a clear edge. The GWM Haval Jolion adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs