CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs GWM Haval Jolion
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs GWM Haval Jolion

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGWM
Price (RRP)$29,990$23,990
Power71kW105kW
0-100 km/h10.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space358L400L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval Jolion opens at $23,990. That makes the GWM Haval Jolion the more affordable entry point by $6,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $26,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $3,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and GWM Haval Jolion hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 90% for the GWM Haval Jolion.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval Jolion packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 6 in the GWM Haval Jolion.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval Jolion gets a 10.3-inch display and 3.5-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval Jolion counters with power tailgate that the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 71kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The GWM Haval Jolion responds with a Petrol making 105kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GWM Haval Jolion has the clear power advantage at 105kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval Jolion is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 142mm shorter than the GWM Haval Jolion at 4,472mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval Jolion generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 400L in the GWM Haval Jolion, giving the GWM Haval Jolion a 42L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval Jolion leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval Jolion Premium
12.0m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Haval Jolion
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $2,309/year for the GWM Haval Jolion. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $2,309 (GWM Haval Jolion). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $770 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval Jolion). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Haval Jolion if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval Jolion takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval Jolion has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and GWM Haval Jolion?

The GWM Haval Jolion is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by $6,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and GWM Haval Jolion all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval Jolion has the largest boot at 400L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval Jolion makes the most power at 105kW. The GWM Haval Jolion is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs