CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Stonic vs Mazda CX-3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Stonic vs Mazda CX-3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaMazda
Price (RRP)$26,990$27,800
Power88kW110kW
0-100 km/h11.2s10.9s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space352L350L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Kia Stonic starts from $26,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the Kia Stonic the more affordable entry point by $810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $29,689 and $30,580 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Stonic features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-3 gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Kia Stonic uses a Petrol producing 88kW and 172Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.2 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 88kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-3 is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Stonic measures 4,140mm long on a 2,580mm wheelbase, 135mm shorter than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Stonic generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 352L in the Kia Stonic and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the Kia Stonic a 2L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.6m

Kia Stonic S
10.4mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Kia Stonic
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-3
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the Kia Stonic and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Kia Stonic.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (Kia Stonic) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The Kia Stonic saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Stonic) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The Kia Stonic has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Stonic if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Stonic takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Kia Stonic will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. The Kia Stonic adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Stonic and Mazda CX-3?

The Kia Stonic is the cheapest at $26,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-3 by $810.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Stonic uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Stonic has the largest boot at 352L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Stonic has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-3 makes the most power at 110kW. The Mazda CX-3 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs