CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Fronx vs Suzuki Ignis
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Fronx vs Suzuki Ignis

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$28,490$22,490
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power75.8kW66kW
0-100 km/h11.5s12.8s
Fuel Economy4.9 L/100km4.9 L/100km
Boot Space304L271L
Warranty3yr / 100k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety1 StarsNo data

Track the Suzuki Fronx & Suzuki Ignis

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Ignis opens at $22,490. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $6,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $24,739 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Fronx features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Ignis gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Fronx gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Ignis offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 75.8kW and 137Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Suzuki Ignis responds with a Petrol making 66kW and 120Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.8 seconds.

The Suzuki Fronx has the clear power advantage at 75.8kW vs 66kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki Fronx is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 295mm longer than the Suzuki Ignis at 3,700mm (2,435mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki Fronx generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 304L in the Suzuki Fronx and 271L in the Suzuki Ignis, giving the Suzuki Fronx a 33L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 605L vs 1101L.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.4m

TightestSuzuki Ignis GL AutoTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4mTighter
Best
Suzuki Fronx GL
10.4m
Worst
Suzuki Fronx GL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki IgnisTightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki Fronx10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki IgnisTightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis.

Estimated annual total: $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Ignis). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Suzuki Fronx takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Fronx has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Suzuki Ignis?

The Suzuki Ignis is the cheapest at $22,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $6,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki Fronx all hold a 1-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Fronx has the largest boot at 304L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki Fronx makes the most power at 75.8kW. The Suzuki Fronx is quickest to 100km/h in 11.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs