CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs GAC Emzoom
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs GAC Emzoom

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGAC
Price (RRP)$21,750$25,590
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW125kW
0-100 km/h7.8s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space380L341L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Chery Tiggo 4 & GAC Emzoom

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $21,750 before on-road costs, while the GAC Emzoom opens at $25,590. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $3,840.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,925 and $28,149 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GAC Emzoom by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GAC Emzoom gets a 14.6-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the GAC Emzoom. The GAC Emzoom counters with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 gets cloth upholstery while the GAC Emzoom offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The GAC Emzoom responds with a Petrol Turbo making 125kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 108kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 103mm shorter than the GAC Emzoom at 4,410mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 341L in the GAC Emzoom, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 39L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
GAC Emzoom Turning circle · Ø 11.2 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,881 (GAC Emzoom). The GAC Emzoom saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom?

The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $21,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $3,840.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 380L.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs