CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs GAC Emzoom
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs GAC Emzoom

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGAC
Price (RRP)$21,750$25,590
Power108kW125kW
0-100 km/h10.5s7.8s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space358L341L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $21,750 before on-road costs, while the GAC Emzoom opens at $25,590. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $3,840.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,925 and $28,149 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GAC Emzoom by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Emzoom packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Chery Tiggo 4.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 6 in the GAC Emzoom.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GAC Emzoom gets a 14.6-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that the Chery Tiggo 4 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 gets cloth upholstery while the GAC Emzoom offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom responds with a Petrol Turbo making 125kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 2.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 103mm shorter than the GAC Emzoom at 4,410mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 341L in the GAC Emzoom, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 17L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

Chery Tiggo 4 Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC Emzoom
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,881 (GAC Emzoom). The GAC Emzoom saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom?

The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $21,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $3,840.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 and GAC Emzoom all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 358L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs