CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs Mahindra XUV 3XO
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Mahindra XUV 3XO

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMahindra
Price (RRP)$21,750$21,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW82kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space380L364L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Chery Tiggo 4 & Mahindra XUV 3XO

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $21,750 before on-road costs, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO opens at $21,800. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $50.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $23,990 for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $23,990 for the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mahindra XUV 3XO by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mahindra XUV 3XO. The Mahindra XUV 3XO counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO responds with a Petrol making 82kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 82kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 317mm longer than the Mahindra XUV 3XO at 3,990mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 16L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Mahindra XUV 3XO Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.5 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Mahindra XUV 3XO saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mahindra XUV 3XO will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and Mahindra XUV 3XO?

The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $21,750 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mahindra XUV 3XO by $50.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 380L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs