CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Haval Jolion vs Mahindra XUV 3XO
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval Jolion vs Mahindra XUV 3XO

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMMahindra
Price (RRP)$23,990$21,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power105kW82kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space337L364L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the GWM Haval Jolion & Mahindra XUV 3XO

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM Haval Jolion starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO opens at $21,800. That makes the Mahindra XUV 3XO the more affordable entry point by $2,190.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $23,980 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mahindra XUV 3XO by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval Jolion features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 3.5-inch digital dash, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval Jolion stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Mahindra XUV 3XO. The Mahindra XUV 3XO counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval Jolion uses a Petrol producing 105kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual clutch (dct) to a FWD layout.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO responds with a Petrol making 82kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The GWM Haval Jolion has the clear power advantage at 105kW vs 82kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval Jolion measures 4,472mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 482mm longer than the Mahindra XUV 3XO at 3,990mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval Jolion generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 337L in the GWM Haval Jolion and 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, giving the Mahindra XUV 3XO a 27L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

TightestMahindra XUV 3XO AX5LTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval Jolion Premium
12.0m
Worst
GWM Haval Jolion Premium
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMahindra XUV 3XOTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM Haval Jolion12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Mahindra XUV 3XOTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the GWM Haval Jolion and $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (GWM Haval Jolion) vs $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Mahindra XUV 3XO saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval Jolion) vs 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval Jolion if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mahindra XUV 3XO will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Haval Jolion and Mahindra XUV 3XO?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the cheapest at $21,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval Jolion by $2,190.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Haval Jolion all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the largest boot at 364L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Haval Jolion has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval Jolion makes the most power at 105kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs