CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-30 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaChery
Price (RRP)$29,990$29,990
Power114kW150kW
0-100 km/h10.9s10.5s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space350L358L
Towing1,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid opens at $29,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-30 and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 99% for the Mazda CX-30 and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-30 and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid responds with a Hybrid making 150kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 114kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 65mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid at 4,330mm (2,604mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 8L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6m
Best
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 6 of 6 key spec categories. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs