CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Sep 2026, price 8 Sep 2026

Mazda CX-30
Mazda

Mazda CX-30

13 of 27 standard · no option data · 14 no data

From $29,990

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

114kW

Economy

6.3 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot (seats up)

317L

69CarSorted Score / 100
Winner
Honda HR-V
Honda

Honda HR-V

12 of 27 standard · no option data · 15 no data

From $30,300 est. RRP

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

89kW

Economy

6.2 L/100km

Safety

4★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

304L

74CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 69, but the Mazda CX-30 is $310 cheaper

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Mazda CX-30G20 Pure8?04
Honda HR-VVi X7?05

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecMazdaHonda
Price (RRP)$29,990$30,300 est.
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$29,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$30,300est. RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power114kW89kW
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km6.2 L/100km
Measured consumption (AAA)6.4 L/100kmAAA test: this grade, 2024 model year7.4 L/100kmAAA test: this grade, 2025 model year
Boot (seats up)317L304L
Towing1,200kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Measured rows: Australian Automobile Association Real-World Testing Program (realworld.org.au), the on-road result for the vehicle each test names, shown beside the maker's figures rather than in place of them and never scored. Mazda CX-30 test page Honda HR-V test page

Track the Mazda CX-30 & Honda HR-V

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda HR-V opens at $30,300 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only). Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $33,330 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Mazda CX-30

  • REC-001591 · published 21 Mar 2021The boot's power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly from the fully opened position when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope in high ambient temperature.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021

Honda HR-V

  • REC-005932 · published 2 Apr 2024This is a re-notification of REC-000585.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2020
  • REC-000585 · published 14 Jul 2020Due to an improper manufacturing process, a component within the fuel pump could swell causing the fuel pump to become inoperative.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2021

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Honda HR-V gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Honda HR-V counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Honda HR-V responds with a Petrol making 89kW and 145Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 89kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 50mm longer than the Honda HR-V at 4,345mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 304L in the Honda HR-V, giving the Mazda CX-30 a 13L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-30 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestMazda CX-30 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Honda HR-V Vi X
11.0m
Worst
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda HR-V Vi X
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-30Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-30Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Honda HR-V11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,767/year for the Honda HR-V. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Honda HR-V.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda HR-V). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda HR-V).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda HR-V if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Honda HR-V: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 69, but the Mazda CX-30 is $310 cheaper

The Honda HR-V comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 69), taking 1 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Honda HR-V ahead by 17), performance (Mazda CX-30 ahead by 6). The Honda HR-V will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V?

The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Honda HR-V by $310.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda HR-V uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Honda HR-V holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda CX-30, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-30 has the largest boot at 317L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs