GWM Haval H6GT vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H6GT starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $750.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $48,664 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H6GT by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H6GT and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6GT packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT and 6 in the Mazda CX-60. The GWM Haval H6GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H6GT features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6GT stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H6GT lines up producing 179kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 lines up making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H6GT measures 4,727mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 18mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 99L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H6GT and $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6GT.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (GWM Haval H6GT) vs $1,910 (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H6GT saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years (GWM Haval H6GT) vs 5 years (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The GWM Haval H6GT and Mazda CX-60 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The GWM Haval H6GT will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (18 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 18 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!