GWM Haval H7 vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the GWM Haval H7 & Mazda CX-60
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H7 starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $45,640. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $1,350.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $50,204 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H7 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the GWM Haval H7 and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H7, against 5 on the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the GWM Haval H7 and 7 in the Mazda CX-60.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H7 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H7 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H7 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H7 uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 530Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The GWM Haval H7 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H7 measures 4,705mm long on a 2,810mm wheelbase, 35mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 483L in the GWM Haval H7 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 87L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m to 11.7m
Based on 11.7m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the GWM Haval H7 and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H7.
Estimated annual total: $1,625 (GWM Haval H7) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H7 saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H7 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval H7 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $45,640 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H7 by $1,350.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Haval H7 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H7 makes the most power at 179kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
