CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›GWM Haval H7 vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval H7 vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 8 Sep 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
GWM Haval H7Vanta HEV9?03
Mazda CX-60G25 Pure9?03

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecGWMMazda
Price (RRP)$46,990$45,640
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$46,990RRP

  • with the Mazda CX-60's standard kit: $46,990 (nothing to add)

$45,640RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power179kW138kW
0-100 km/h7.9s7.4s
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot (seats up)483L570L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the GWM Haval H7 & Mazda CX-60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM Haval H7 starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $45,640. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $1,350.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $46,990 for the GWM Haval H7 and $47,990 for the Mazda CX-60.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H7 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the GWM Haval H7 and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H7, against 5 on the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the GWM Haval H7 and 7 in the Mazda CX-60.

Recalls on our record

GWM Haval H7

  • REC-006513 · published 18 Dec 2025The HAVAL H7 headrest utilises a unilateral locking mechanism, where the locking pin slides downward along the headrest rod into the lock slot to secure the position.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025

Mazda CX-60

  • REC-006174 · published 14 Nov 2024Due to a software issue, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) and Battery Energy Control Module (BECM) may impact the hybrid battery assist function.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • REC-006173 · published 14 Nov 2024Due to a software issue, the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) and Battery Energy Control Module (BECM) may impact the hybrid battery assist function.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • REC-006172 · published 14 Nov 2024Due to software improper programming of the Dash Electronic Supply Unit (Dash-ESU), when the hybrid system is powered on multiple warning messages may display in the instrument cluster:Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
  • 2 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval H7 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval H7 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H7 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval H7 uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 530Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The GWM Haval H7 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 138kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda CX-60 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval H7 measures 4,705mm long on a 2,810mm wheelbase, 35mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 483L in the GWM Haval H7 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 87L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.7m

TightestMazda CX-60 G25 PureTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H7 Vanta HEV
11.7m
Worst
GWM Haval H7 Vanta HEV
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-60Tightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM Haval H711.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda CX-60Tightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the GWM Haval H7 and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H7.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval H7 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

GWM Haval H7: Top CarSorted Score, 80 vs 76, but the Mazda CX-60 is $1,350 cheaper

The GWM Haval H7 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (80 vs 76), taking 3 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (GWM Haval H7 ahead by 17), performance (GWM Haval H7 ahead by 10), value (GWM Haval H7 ahead by 5). The GWM Haval H7 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $45,640 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H7 by $1,350.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H7 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: GWM Haval H7 and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Haval H7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval H7 makes the most power at 179kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs