GWM Haval H7 vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the GWM Haval H7 & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H7 starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Toyota C-HR the more affordable entry point by $50.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $51,634 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $2,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H7 and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval H7 and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H7 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Toyota C-HR.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the GWM Haval H7 and 10 in the Toyota C-HR. The GWM Haval H7 adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota C-HR misses.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H7 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H7 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H7 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota C-HR offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H7 uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 530Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The GWM Haval H7 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H7 is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H7 measures 4,705mm long on a 2,810mm wheelbase, 343mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H7 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 483L in the GWM Haval H7 and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the GWM Haval H7 a 95L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Haval H7 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 775kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.7m
Based on 11.7m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the GWM Haval H7 and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $485 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.
Estimated annual total: $1,625 (GWM Haval H7) vs $1,140 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $485 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The GWM Haval H7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H7 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $485 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H7 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H7 and Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H7 by $50.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H7 and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H7 has the largest boot at 483L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H7 makes the most power at 179kW. The GWM Haval H7 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
