CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiToyota
Price (RRP)$47,790$46,940
Fuel typePlug-in HybridHybrid
Range (WLTP)55km
Battery13.8 kWh
Electric range55km
Power94kW103kW
0-100 km/h9.7s10.2s
Max DC Charge22kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy7.3 kWh/100km (as hybrid)4 L/100km
Boot Space359L388L
Towing1,500kg725kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV & Toyota C-HR

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV starts from $47,790 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Toyota C-HR the more affordable entry point by $850.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $52,569 and $51,634 respectively.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota C-HR, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV by roughly $3,950 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

13.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

30 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 22kW · 0–80%

38 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 22kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses a Petrol producing 94kW and 199Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.7 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR has the clear power advantage at 103kW vs 94kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV measures 4,545mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 183mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 359L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Toyota C-HR a 29L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 775kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.8m

TightestToyota C-HR GXLTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m
Worst
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota C-HRTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota C-HRTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $350/year for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $790 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $350 (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV) vs $1,140 (Toyota C-HR). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV saves you roughly $790 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and Toyota C-HR trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV will save you roughly $790 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and Toyota C-HR?

The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV by $850.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 388L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota C-HR makes the most power at 103kW. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is quickest to 100km/h in 9.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best hybrid cars