CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota C-HR vs Volkswagen Tayron
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota C-HR vs Volkswagen Tayron

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$46,940$48,290
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power103kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.2s
Fuel Economy4 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space388L345L
Towing725kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Toyota C-HR & Volkswagen Tayron

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota C-HR starts from $46,940 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Tayron opens at $48,290. That makes the Toyota C-HR the more affordable entry point by $1,350.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,634 and $53,119 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $5,130 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Toyota C-HR and Volkswagen Tayron hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota C-HR and 87% for the Volkswagen Tayron.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Toyota C-HR and 9 in the Volkswagen Tayron. The Volkswagen Tayron adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota C-HR misses.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota C-HR features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Tayron gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volkswagen Tayron counters with wireless charging and power tailgate that the Toyota C-HR does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota C-HR uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Volkswagen Tayron responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels.

The Volkswagen Tayron has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 103kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota C-HR measures 4,362mm long on a 2,640mm wheelbase, 430mm shorter than the Volkswagen Tayron at 4,792mm (2,790mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Tayron generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 388L in the Toyota C-HR and 345L in the Volkswagen Tayron, giving the Toyota C-HR a 43L advantage. The Volkswagen Tayron seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Volkswagen Tayron leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 1,075kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 12.1m

TightestToyota C-HR GXLTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Tayron 110TSI Life
12.1m
Worst
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Tayron 110TSI Life
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota C-HRTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota C-HRTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Volkswagen Tayron12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR and $2,166/year for the Volkswagen Tayron. That is a $1,026 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $1,140 (Toyota C-HR) vs $2,166 (Volkswagen Tayron). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $1,026 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Tayron). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Tayron if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota C-HR takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $1,026 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota C-HR has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota C-HR and Volkswagen Tayron?

The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen Tayron by $1,350.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota C-HR and Volkswagen Tayron all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 388L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Tayron has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Tayron makes the most power at 110kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs