Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mazda CX-60 & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-60 starts from $45,640 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $1,300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,204 and $51,634 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $4,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Mazda CX-60 and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Toyota C-HR, against 5 on the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-60 and 10 in the Toyota C-HR.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-60 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,740mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 378mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 182L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 1,075kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.8m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $998 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Mazda CX-60) vs $1,140 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $998 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-60 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $998 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-60 and Toyota C-HR?
The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $45,640 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $1,300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
