CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota C-HR vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota C-HR vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaToyota
Price (RRP)$46,940$45,990
Fuel typeHybridHybrid
Power103kW143kW
0-100 km/h10.2s8.4s
Fuel Economy4 L/100km4.5 L/100km
Boot Space388L705L
Towing725kg800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota C-HR & Toyota RAV4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota C-HR starts from $46,940 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $45,990. That makes the Toyota RAV4 the more affordable entry point by $950.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,634 and $50,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota C-HR features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Toyota C-HR uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 143kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota RAV4 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota C-HR measures 4,362mm long on a 2,640mm wheelbase, 238mm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota RAV4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 388L in the Toyota C-HR and 705L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 317L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota RAV4 leads with a 800kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 75kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.4m

TightestToyota C-HR GXLTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m
Worst
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota C-HRTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota C-HRTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota RAV411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR and $1,283/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $1,140 (Toyota C-HR) vs $1,283 (Toyota RAV4). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota RAV4). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota RAV4 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota C-HR and Toyota RAV4?

The Toyota RAV4 is the cheapest at $45,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $950.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota RAV4 has the largest boot at 705L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota RAV4 makes the most power at 143kW. The Toyota RAV4 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.4s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars