CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Karoq vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Karoq vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)$44,490$45,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power110kW143kW
0-100 km/h9.2s8.4s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km4.5 L/100km
Boot Space521L
Towing1,500kg800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Skoda Karoq & Toyota RAV4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Karoq starts from $44,490 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $45,990. That makes the Skoda Karoq the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $46,990 for the Skoda Karoq and $50,872 for the Toyota RAV4.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota RAV4 by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Karoq features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Karoq stands out with power tailgate, Canton audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota RAV4. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Karoq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 8 speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 143kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota RAV4 is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Karoq measures 4,390mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 210mm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota RAV4 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Skoda Karoq leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.4m

TightestSkoda Karoq 110TSI SportlineTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2mTighter
Best
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m
Worst
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KaroqTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda KaroqTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota RAV411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Skoda Karoq and $1,283/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota RAV4). The Skoda Karoq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Skoda Karoq and Toyota RAV4 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. The Skoda Karoq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Karoq and Toyota RAV4?

The Skoda Karoq is the cheapest at $44,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota RAV4 by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota RAV4 uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Skoda Karoq and Toyota RAV4 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Karoq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Karoq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota RAV4 makes the most power at 143kW. The Toyota RAV4 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.4s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars