CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultToyota
Price (RRP)$39,990$46,940
Power105kW103kW
0-100 km/h9.4s8.2s
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km4.7 L/100km
Boot Space430L388L
Towing1,200kg725kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Renault Arkana starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Renault Arkana the more affordable entry point by $6,950.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $51,634 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Renault Arkana and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Renault Arkana and 7 in the Toyota C-HR.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Arkana features a 9.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Arkana stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Renault Arkana gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota C-HR offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Renault Arkana and 2-zone in the Toyota C-HR.

Drivetrain

The Renault Arkana uses a Petrol producing 105kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Renault Arkana has the clear power advantage at 105kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Arkana measures 4,568mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 208mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Arkana generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Renault Arkana and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Renault Arkana a 42L advantage.

For towing, the Renault Arkana leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 475kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.8m

Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4mTighter
Best
Renault Arkana Intens
10.8m
Worst
Renault Arkana
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,482/year for the Renault Arkana and $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $1,482 (Renault Arkana) vs $1,340 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Arkana) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Arkana if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Arkana takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Arkana has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR?

The Renault Arkana is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $6,950.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Arkana has the largest boot at 430L.

Which can tow the most?

The Renault Arkana has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Arkana makes the most power at 105kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs