CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Arkana vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Arkana vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultMazda
Price (RRP)$39,990$39,990
Power105kW132kW
0-100 km/h9.4s8.7s
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space430L522L
Towing1,200kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Renault Arkana starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Arkana by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Renault Arkana and Mazda CX-5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Renault Arkana and 95% for the Mazda CX-5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Renault Arkana packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Renault Arkana and 6 in the Mazda CX-5.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Arkana features a 9.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Arkana stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Arkana uses a Petrol producing 105kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 132kW and 242Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Arkana measures 4,568mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 7mm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,575mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Arkana generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Renault Arkana and 522L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 92L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Renault Arkana Evolution
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0m
Worst
Renault Arkana
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,482/year for the Renault Arkana and $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Renault Arkana.

Estimated annual total: $1,482 (Renault Arkana) vs $2,109 (Mazda CX-5). The Renault Arkana saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Arkana) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Arkana if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Renault Arkana will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs