Mazda CX-5 vs LDV D90
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 16 Sep 2026
Track the Mazda CX-5 & LDV D90
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the LDV D90 opens at $39,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $43,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-5 by roughly $2,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the LDV D90 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-5 gets cloth upholstery while the LDV D90 offers leatherette.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 132kW and 242Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.
The LDV D90 responds with a Petrol Turbo making 184kW and 410Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The LDV D90 has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 132kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda CX-5 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,690mm long on a 2,815mm wheelbase, 356mm shorter than the LDV D90 at 5,046mm (2,950mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the LDV D90 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 466L in the Mazda CX-5 and 343L in the LDV D90, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 123L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1594L vs 2382L. The LDV D90 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the LDV D90 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 12.0m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $2,594/year for the LDV D90. That is a $485 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-5.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 7 years / 200,000km (LDV D90). The LDV D90 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the LDV D90 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer LDV's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mazda CX-5: Top CarSorted Score, 67 vs 60
The Mazda CX-5 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (67 vs 60), taking 3 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Mazda CX-5 ahead by 27), fuel economy (Mazda CX-5 ahead by 15), practicality (LDV D90 ahead by 13). The Mazda CX-5 will save you roughly $485 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The LDV D90 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and LDV D90?
The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mazda CX-5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for LDV D90, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 466L with the seats up (1,594L with the seats folded).
Which can tow the most?
The LDV D90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The LDV D90 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The LDV D90 makes the most power at 184kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
