CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV vs Volvo EX30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV vs Volvo EX30

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiVolvo
Price (RRP)$47,790$49,990
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)55km462km
Battery13.8 kWh69 kWh
Electric range55km
Power94kW200kW
0-100 km/h9.7s5.3s
Max DC Charge22kW153kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min26 min
Fuel Economy7.3 kWh/100km (as hybrid)
Boot Space359L318L
Towing1,500kg1,600kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV & Volvo EX30

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV starts from $47,790 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX30 opens at $49,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV the more affordable entry point by $2,200.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $52,569 and $54,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

13.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

30 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 22kW · 0–80%

38 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 22kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

49kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

47 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 153kW · 0–80%

19 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 153kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX30 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Volvo EX30. The Volvo EX30 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo EX30 offers nordico/microtech fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and 1-zone in the Volvo EX30.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses a Petrol producing 94kW and 199Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.7 seconds.

The Volvo EX30 responds with a Electric making 200kW and 343Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.3 seconds.

The Volvo EX30 has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 94kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX30 is 4.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 13.8kWh (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV) vs 69kWh (Volvo EX30), giving WLTP ranges of 55km and 462km. DC fast charging peaks at 22kW (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV) vs 153kW (Volvo EX30).

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV measures 4,545mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 312mm longer than the Volvo EX30 at 4,233mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 359L in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and 318L in the Volvo EX30, giving the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV a 41L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo EX30 leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

TightestMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ESTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8mTighter
Best
Volvo EX30 Plus Single Motor
11.0m
Worst
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV ES
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo EX30 Plus Single Motor
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEVTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEVTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Volvo EX3011.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX30). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX30 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo EX30 takes 7 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV and Volvo EX30?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV is the cheapest at $47,790 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo EX30 by $2,200.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volvo EX30 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the largest boot at 359L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo EX30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX30 makes the most power at 200kW. The Volvo EX30 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.3s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs