Volkswagen Polo vs Abarth 695
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Volkswagen Polo starts from $32,990 before on-road costs, while the Abarth 695 opens at $48,369. That makes the Volkswagen Polo the more affordable entry point by $15,379.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $36,289 and $53,206 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Volkswagen Polo and Abarth 695 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volkswagen Polo packs more ADAS features with 3 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Abarth 695.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Volkswagen Polo and 7 in the Abarth 695.
Feature Showdown
The Volkswagen Polo features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Abarth 695 gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Volkswagen Polo stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Abarth 695. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Volkswagen Polo uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Abarth 695 responds with a Turbo T-Jet making 132kW and 250Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.
The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 695 is 3.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Volkswagen Polo measures 4,080mm long on a 2,564mm wheelbase, 423mm longer than the Abarth 695 at 3,657mm (2,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Polo generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 381L in the Volkswagen Polo and 185L in the Abarth 695, giving the Volkswagen Polo a 196L advantage. The Volkswagen Polo seats 5 vs 4.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 10.1m
Based on 10.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Volkswagen Polo and $1,710/year for the Abarth 695. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Polo.
Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Volkswagen Polo) vs $1,710 (Abarth 695). The Volkswagen Polo saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Polo) vs 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695). The Volkswagen Polo has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Volkswagen Polo if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Volkswagen Polo takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Polo will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Polo has a clear edge. The Volkswagen Polo adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Polo and Abarth 695?
The Volkswagen Polo is the cheapest at $32,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $15,379.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volkswagen Polo uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Polo and Abarth 695 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volkswagen Polo has the largest boot at 381L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Volkswagen Polo has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
