CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolkswagen Tiguan vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen Tiguan vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolkswagenMazda
Price (RRP)$52,990$74,385
Power110kW254kW
0-100 km/h7.5s7.8s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km8.2 L/100km
Boot Space615L257L
Towing2,000kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Volkswagen Tiguan starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the Volkswagen Tiguan the more affordable entry point by $21,395.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $81,824 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Volkswagen Tiguan and Mazda CX-90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the Volkswagen Tiguan and 91% for the Mazda CX-90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Volkswagen Tiguan and 6 in the Mazda CX-90. The Volkswagen Tiguan adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-90 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Volkswagen Tiguan features a 12.9-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen Tiguan uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen Tiguan measures 4,539mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 581mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 615L in the Volkswagen Tiguan and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the Volkswagen Tiguan a 358L advantage. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.4m

Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Tiguan 110TSI Life
11.4m
Worst
Volkswagen Tiguan
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Volkswagen Tiguan and $2,337/year for the Mazda CX-90. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Tiguan.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Volkswagen Tiguan) vs $2,337 (Mazda CX-90). The Volkswagen Tiguan saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Tiguan) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen Tiguan if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen Tiguan takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Tiguan will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Tiguan has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Tiguan and Mazda CX-90?

The Volkswagen Tiguan is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-90 by $21,395.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Tiguan uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Tiguan and Mazda CX-90 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Tiguan has the largest boot at 615L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-90 makes the most power at 254kW. The Volkswagen Tiguan is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs