CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Karoq vs Subaru Outback
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Karoq vs Subaru Outback

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaSubaru
Price (RRP)$40,990$48,990
Power110kW137kW
0-100 km/h8.6s9.9s
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km8.6 L/100km
Boot Space521L975L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Karoq starts from $40,990 before on-road costs, while the Subaru Outback opens at $48,990. That makes the Skoda Karoq the more affordable entry point by $8,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,089 and $53,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Karoq by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Karoq and Subaru Outback hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the Skoda Karoq and 88% for the Subaru Outback.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Skoda Karoq and 9 in the Subaru Outback.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Karoq features a 9.2-inch touchscreen, while the Subaru Outback gets a 12.1-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Karoq stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Subaru Outback. The Subaru Outback counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Karoq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Subaru Outback responds with a Petrol making 137kW and 254Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The Subaru Outback has the clear power advantage at 137kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Karoq is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Karoq measures 4,382mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 488mm shorter than the Subaru Outback at 4,870mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Outback generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 521L in the Skoda Karoq and 975L in the Subaru Outback, giving the Subaru Outback a 454L advantage.

For towing, the Subaru Outback leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Subaru Outback AWD
10.8mTighter
Best
Skoda Karoq 110TSI
11.0m
Worst
Skoda Karoq
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru Outback
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Skoda Karoq and $2,451/year for the Subaru Outback. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Karoq.

Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Skoda Karoq) vs $2,451 (Subaru Outback). The Skoda Karoq saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Outback). The Skoda Karoq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru Outback if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Karoq takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Karoq will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru Outback has a clear edge. The Skoda Karoq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Karoq and Subaru Outback?

The Skoda Karoq is the cheapest at $40,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Outback by $8,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Karoq uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Karoq and Subaru Outback all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Outback has the largest boot at 975L.

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Outback has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Karoq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Outback makes the most power at 137kW. The Skoda Karoq is quickest to 100km/h in 8.6s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs