Subaru Outback vs GWM Tank 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 11 Sep 2026, price 8 Sep 2026
Track the Subaru Outback & GWM Tank 300
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Subaru Outback starts from $48,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Subaru Outback the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,889 and $54,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Subaru Outback by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Subaru Outback and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Subaru Outback and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Subaru Outback and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.
Recalls on our record
Subaru Outback
- REC-005831 · published 20 Nov 2023The front drive shaft may not meet manufacturing specifications and the outer race of the front driveshaft may crack.Year range on the notice: 2023
- REC-005485 · published 3 Aug 2022Due to a manufacturing issue, the Electronic Park Brake (EPB) adaptor cord connector may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2018
- REC-001697 · published 24 Aug 2021The fuel pump impeller may not meet manufacturing specifications, as a result it may become deformed.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2019
- 10 more on the model page.
GWM Tank 300
- REC-006516 · published 24 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the shielding ring in the high voltage wiring harness may not be properly grounded.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006024 · published 22 Jul 2024The adjusting rod used to operate the vehicle jack is of incorrect specification and may not function as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Subaru Outback features a 12.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Subaru Outback stands out with heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the GWM Tank 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Subaru Outback uses a Petrol producing 137kW and 254Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout.
The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 162kW and 380Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 162kW vs 137kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Subaru Outback measures 4,880mm long on a 2,745mm wheelbase, 165mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 530L in the Subaru Outback and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 20L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.1m to 12.0m
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Subaru Outback and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Subaru Outback.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Outback) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Subaru Outback if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Subaru Outback: Top CarSorted Score, 68 vs 66
The Subaru Outback comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (68 vs 66), taking 2 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Subaru Outback ahead by 13), practicality (GWM Tank 300 ahead by 10), performance (GWM Tank 300 ahead by 8). The Subaru Outback will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Subaru Outback and GWM Tank 300?
The Subaru Outback is the cheapest at $48,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $1,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Subaru Outback uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Subaru Outback and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 162kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!









