CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 300 vs KGM Rexton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 300 vs KGM Rexton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMKGM
Price (RRP)$49,990$50,000
Power167kW149kW
0-100 km/h9.5s11.5s
Fuel Economy9.5 L/100km8.7 L/100km
Boot Space550L236L
Towing2,000kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 300 starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the KGM Rexton opens at $50,000. That makes the GWM Tank 300 the more affordable entry point by $10.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $55,000 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the KGM Rexton by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Tank 300 and KGM Rexton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Tank 300 and 6 in the KGM Rexton.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 300 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the KGM Rexton gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 300 stands out with panoramic roof that you will not find on the KGM Rexton. The KGM Rexton counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 300 uses a Petrol producing 167kW and 387Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The KGM Rexton responds with a Turbo DDi Diesel making 149kW and 441Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 149kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 300 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 300 measures 4,715mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 135mm shorter than the KGM Rexton at 4,850mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the GWM Tank 300 and 236L in the KGM Rexton, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 314L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.0m

KGM Rexton ELX
11.6mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Rexton
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300 and $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the KGM Rexton.

Estimated annual total: $2,708 (GWM Tank 300) vs $2,480 (KGM Rexton). The KGM Rexton saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 300 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The KGM Rexton will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 300 and KGM Rexton?

The GWM Tank 300 is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Rexton by $10.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Rexton uses the least fuel at 8.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 300 and KGM Rexton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 167kW. The GWM Tank 300 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs