CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Rexton vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Rexton vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$50,000$51,540
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power149kW133kW
0-100 km/h11.5s11.5s
Fuel Economy8.7 L/100km8 L/100km
Boot Space236L673L
Towing3,500kg3,100kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the KGM Rexton & Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport opens at $51,540. That makes the KGM Rexton the more affordable entry point by $1,540.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $56,694 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Rexton stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Rexton gets leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the KGM Rexton and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

Drivetrain

The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport responds with a Diesel making 133kW and 430Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The KGM Rexton has the clear power advantage at 149kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 10mm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport at 4,840mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 673L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, giving the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport a 437L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,100kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.6m

TightestMitsubishi Pajero Sport GLXTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX
11.2mTighter
Best
KGM Rexton ELX
11.6m
Worst
KGM Rexton ELX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Pajero SportTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM Rexton11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi Pajero SportTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $2,280/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $2,280 (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The KGM Rexton and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Rexton and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport?

The KGM Rexton is the cheapest at $50,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport by $1,540.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses the least fuel at 8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Rexton and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the largest boot at 673L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Rexton makes the most power at 149kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs