CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsOmoda 9 vs Peugeot e-208
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Omoda 9 vs Peugeot e-208

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecOmodaPeugeot
Price (RRP)$61,990$63,000
Range (WLTP)169km400km
Battery34 kWh54 kWh
Power105kW115kW
0-100 km/h4.9s8.2s
Max DC Charge70kW100kW
10-80% Charge Time25 min25 min
Fuel Economy1.4 kWh/100km14.3 kWh/100km
Boot Space660L311L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty8yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The Omoda 9 starts from $61,990 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot e-208 opens at $63,000. That makes the Omoda 9 the more affordable entry point by $1,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $68,189 and $69,300 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Omoda 9 by roughly $3,095 in electricity alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Omoda 9 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Sony audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Peugeot e-208. The Peugeot e-208 counters with Apple CarPlay and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Omoda 9 uses a Plug-in Hybrid producing 105kW and 215Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.9 seconds.

The Peugeot e-208 responds with a Electric Motor making 115kW and 260Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Peugeot e-208 has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 9 is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 34kWh (Omoda 9) vs 54kWh (Peugeot e-208), giving WLTP ranges of 169km and 400km. DC fast charging peaks at 70kW (Omoda 9) vs 100kW (Peugeot e-208).

Space & Comfort

The Omoda 9 measures 4,775mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 720mm longer than the Peugeot e-208 at 4,055mm (2,540mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 660L in the Omoda 9 and 311L in the Peugeot e-208, giving the Omoda 9 a 349L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Omoda 9 SHS Virtue AWD
11.4m
Omoda 9
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, electricity costs roughly $67/year for the Omoda 9 and $686/year for the Peugeot e-208. That is a $619 annual difference in favour of the Omoda 9.

Estimated annual total: $67 (Omoda 9) vs $686 (Peugeot e-208). The Omoda 9 saves you roughly $619 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 8 years / 999,999km (Omoda 9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot e-208). The Omoda 9 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Omoda 9 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot e-208 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Omoda 9 and Peugeot e-208 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Omoda 9 will save you roughly $619 a year in electricity. If boot space matters, the Omoda 9 has a clear edge. The Omoda 9 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Omoda 9 and Peugeot e-208?

The Omoda 9 is the cheapest at $61,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot e-208 by $1,010.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Omoda 9 uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Omoda 9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Omoda 9 has the largest boot at 660L.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Omoda 9 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Peugeot e-208 makes the most power at 115kW. The Omoda 9 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Hatchbacks