Omoda 9 vs MINI Aceman
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026
Omoda 9: we're still completing kerb weight, torque and energy consumption.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Omoda 9 & MINI Aceman
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Omoda 9 starts from $61,990 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the MINI Aceman the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $68,189 and $67,089 respectively.
The MINI Aceman currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Omoda 9 does not: plug-in hybrids lost the fbt exemption on 1 april 2025.
Safety Rundown
Both the Omoda 9 and MINI Aceman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the Omoda 9 and 83% for the MINI Aceman.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Omoda 9 and 9 in the MINI Aceman.
Recalls on our record
Omoda 9
None open on our record
MINI Aceman
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
34kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 70kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 70kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
49.2kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 95kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Omoda 9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Omoda 9 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Sony audio — features our data doesn't list for the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Omoda 9 gets leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Omoda 9 uses a Plug-in Hybrid producing 395kW, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.9 seconds.
The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.
The Omoda 9 has the clear power advantage at 395kW vs 160kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Omoda 9 is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 34kWh (Omoda 9) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 169km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 70kW (Omoda 9) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).
Space & Comfort
The Omoda 9 measures 4,775mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 702mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 9 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 660L in the Omoda 9 and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the Omoda 9 a 360L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.1m to 11.4m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 8 years / 999,999km (Omoda 9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). The Omoda 9 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Omoda 9 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MINI Aceman if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Omoda 9: Top CarSorted Score, 83 vs 73, but the MINI Aceman is $1,000 cheaper
The Omoda 9 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (83 vs 73), taking 6 of 10 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: practicality (Omoda 9 ahead by 29), technology (Omoda 9 ahead by 28), performance (Omoda 9 ahead by 26). If boot space matters, the Omoda 9 has a clear edge. The Omoda 9 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Omoda 9 and MINI Aceman?
The MINI Aceman is the cheapest at $60,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 9 by $1,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Omoda 9 uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Omoda 9 and MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 9 has the largest boot at 660L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Omoda 9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 9 has the longest warranty at 8 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Omoda 9 makes the most power at 395kW. The Omoda 9 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
