Omoda 9 vs Skoda Enyaq

The Omoda 9 starts from $61,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $68,189 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Both the Omoda 9 and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the Omoda 9 and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Omoda 9 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Omoda 9 and 9 in the Skoda Enyaq.

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

The Omoda 9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Omoda 9 stands out with panoramic roof, Sony audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Omoda 9 gets leather upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Omoda 9 and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

The Omoda 9 uses a Plug-in Hybrid producing 395kW and 215Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.9 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The Omoda 9 has the clear power advantage at 395kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 9 is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 34kWh (Omoda 9) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 169km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 70kW (Omoda 9) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

The Omoda 9 measures 4,775mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 117mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 660L in the Omoda 9 and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Omoda 9 a 75L advantage.

For towing, the Omoda 9 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 8 years / 999,999km (Omoda 9) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Omoda 9 has longer coverage.