CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMINI Aceman vs Skoda Enyaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MINI Aceman vs Skoda Enyaq

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMINISkoda
Price (RRP)$60,990$59,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)352km575km
Battery54.2 kWh82 kWh
Power160kW210kW
0-100 km/h7.1s6.7s
Max DC Charge95kW175kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min21 min
Boot Space300L585L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MINI Aceman & Skoda Enyaq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MINI Aceman starts from $60,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,089 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the MINI Aceman and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the MINI Aceman and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MINI Aceman packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the MINI Aceman and 9 in the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the MINI Aceman misses.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

49.2kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

47 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 95kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

26 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The MINI Aceman features a 9.4-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman stands out with panoramic roof, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MINI Aceman gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the MINI Aceman and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

Drivetrain

The MINI Aceman uses a Electric producing 160kW and 330Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.1 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 352km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 95kW (MINI Aceman) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

Space & Comfort

The MINI Aceman measures 4,073mm long on a 2,606mm wheelbase, 585mm shorter than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the MINI Aceman and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 285L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.1m

TightestSkoda Enyaq 85 SportlineTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1m
Worst
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda EnyaqTightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
MINI Aceman11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Skoda EnyaqTightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 10 of 10 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MINI Aceman and Skoda Enyaq?

The Skoda Enyaq is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $1,000.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 547km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Enyaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs