CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan ARIYA vs Skoda Enyaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan ARIYA vs Skoda Enyaq

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanSkoda
Price (RRP)$55,840$59,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)385km575km
Battery63 kWh82 kWh
Power160kW210kW
0-100 km/h8s6.7s
Max DC Charge130kW175kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min21 min
Boot Space466L585L
Towing750kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Nissan ARIYA & Skoda Enyaq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan ARIYA starts from $55,840 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Nissan ARIYA the more affordable entry point by $4,150.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,424 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan ARIYA and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Nissan ARIYA and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Nissan ARIYA packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan ARIYA and 9 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

87kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 24m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 130kW · 0–80%

40 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 130kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

26 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan ARIYA features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Enyaq counters with ventilated seats that the Nissan ARIYA does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan ARIYA gets nappa leather upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Nissan ARIYA and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

Drivetrain

The Nissan ARIYA uses a Electric producing 160kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 63kWh (Nissan ARIYA) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 385km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 130kW (Nissan ARIYA) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

Space & Comfort

The Nissan ARIYA measures 4,595mm long on a 2,775mm wheelbase, 63mm shorter than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan ARIYA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 466L in the Nissan ARIYA and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 119L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Enyaq leads with a 1,000kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.5m

TightestSkoda Enyaq 85 SportlineTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
Nissan ARIYA Engage 63kWh FWD
11.5m
Worst
Nissan ARIYA Engage 63kWh FWD
11.5m · Average

Based on 11.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda EnyaqTightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan ARIYA11.5 m
Average△ 3-point
Skoda EnyaqTightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan ARIYA) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan ARIYA if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 9 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan ARIYA and Skoda Enyaq?

The Nissan ARIYA is the cheapest at $55,840 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq by $4,150.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 547km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan ARIYA and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Enyaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs