CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona Electric vs Skoda Enyaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona Electric vs Skoda Enyaq

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiSkoda
Price (RRP)$54,000$59,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)395km575km
Battery48.6 kWh82 kWh
Power99kW210kW
0-100 km/h9.9s6.7s
Max DC Charge100kW175kW
10-80% Charge Time47 min21 min
Boot Space407L585L
Towing1,300kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars
V2LYes (3.6kW)No

Track the Hyundai Kona Electric & Skoda Enyaq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric starts from $54,000 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Hyundai Kona Electric the more affordable entry point by $5,990.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,400 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

The Skoda Enyaq holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Hyundai Kona Electric. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona Electric and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 9 in the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the Hyundai Kona Electric misses.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

64.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 2m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 100kW · 0–80%

39 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 100kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 175kW · 0–80%

26 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 175kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai Kona Electric stands out with V2L that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with head-up display, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai Kona Electric gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona Electric uses a Electric producing 99kW and 255Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 99kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 3.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 48.6kWh (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 395km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona Electric measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 308mm shorter than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 407L in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 178L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai Kona Electric leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

TightestSkoda Enyaq 85 SportlineTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
Hyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kW
10.6m
Worst
Hyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kW
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda EnyaqTightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai Kona Electric10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda EnyaqTightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona Electric if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 9 of 12 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona Electric and Skoda Enyaq?

The Hyundai Kona Electric is the cheapest at $54,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq by $5,990.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 547km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

The Skoda Enyaq has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Kona Electric has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs