

Toyota RAV4 vs Mazda CX-5: Spec Battle
Australia's two most popular SUVs, which one deserves your driveway?
Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 16 Sep 2026
Comparison snapshot
Prices, scores and edges below update from our car data.

Lighter on fuel by 2.9 L/100km, 239L more boot

Cheaper by $6,000, tows 1,000kg more
Written 3 April 2026. The snapshot, tables, scores and verdict on this page update from our car data; figures quoted in the text are as at that date.
Price
The CX-5 starts $4,370 cheaper at $40,190 vs $44,560 for the RAV4 GXL Hybrid. But the RAV4's hybrid powertrain saves ~$627/year in fuel. Over 5 years, the RAV4 recoups the higher purchase price through fuel savings and better resale value.
5-Year Cost of Ownership
| Cost | RAV4 Hybrid | CX-5 Petrol |
|---|---|---|
| Driveaway (est. VIC) | ~$49,000 | ~$44,500 |
| 5yr Fuel | $6,840 | $9,975 |
| 5yr Servicing | $3,500 | $3,200 |
| 5yr Insurance | $8,500 | $7,800 |
| Resale (est. 5yr) | -$27,000 | -$22,000 |
| True 5yr cost | $40,840 | $43,475 |
The RAV4 is ~$2,635 cheaper over 5 years despite the higher purchase price, thanks to fuel savings and stronger resale.
Safety
The CX-5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating from 2025. The current RAV4 is listed by ANCAP as unrated: the previous generation's 5-star result was from 2019 and expired at the end of 2025, and an expired rating does not carry across to the new car. So there is no published crash score for the RAV4 to compare against. Both come standard with AEB, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert, lane keep assist, and adaptive cruise control.
The RAV4 has Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 with intersection turn assist and emergency steering assist. The CX-5 has i-Activsense with front cross traffic alert. Both are thorough active safety packages, but only the Mazda has an ANCAP result behind it.
Features
This is where the CX-5 shines. The Mazda's interior quality is noticeably better. Softer materials, tighter panel gaps, and a more cohesive design. The 10.25-inch screen with Mazda Connect is clean and responsive.
The RAV4 GXL Hybrid gets a 10.5-inch screen, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, digital key, and a power tailgate. The CX-5 Touring adds leather-like upholstery, heated front seats, and a head-up display.
Standard on both:
- Apple CarPlay / Android Auto
- Reversing camera
- Dual-zone climate control
- Rear USB ports
- LED headlights
- Push-button start
RAV4 GXL advantages:
- Wireless CarPlay/AA
- Bigger boot (542L vs 438L)
- Digital key
- Power tailgate
CX-5 Touring advantages:
- Better interior materials
- Head-up display
- Heated front seats
- Higher towing capacity (2,000kg vs 1,500kg)
- Better driving dynamics
Drivetrain
The RAV4 uses a 2.5L naturally-aspirated 4-cylinder paired with an electric motor for a combined 163kW. The hybrid system switches seamlessly between electric-only, petrol-only, and combined modes. In city driving, it runs on electric power up to ~50km/h.
The CX-5 runs a 2.5L Skyactiv-G naturally-aspirated petrol engine making 140kW and 252Nm. No turbo, no hybrid. Just a refined, naturally-aspirated engine with direct injection. It revs smoothly and responds predictably.
| Engine Spec | RAV4 Hybrid | CX-5 Petrol |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | 2.5L + electric motor | 2.5L |
| Power | 163kW (combined) | 140kW |
| Torque | 221Nm (engine only) | 252Nm |
| Transmission | CVT (e-CVT) | 6-speed torque converter |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds |
| Drag Coefficient | Cd 0.30 | Cd 0.30 |
The RAV4 is quicker (8.1s vs 9.2s to 100) thanks to the electric motor's instant torque off the line. The CX-5 feels more linear and connected. The 6-speed auto shifts predictably while the CVT can feel vague under hard acceleration.
Space and comfort
The CX-5's cabin is a class above. Soft-touch dashboard materials, piano black accents, and tight panel gaps give it a near-premium feel. The driving position is lower and sportier.
The RAV4 is more utilitarian inside. Harder plastics, wider gaps, but more storage compartments and a larger centre console. The higher seating position gives better visibility.
Dimensions Compared
| Dimension | RAV4 | CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,600mm | 4,575mm |
| Width | 1,855mm | 1,845mm |
| Height | 1,685mm | 1,680mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm | 2,700mm |
| Boot Space | 542L | 438L |
| Ground Clearance | 195mm | 200mm |
| Kerb Weight | 1,640kg | 1,558kg |
| Fuel Tank | 55L | 56L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
They're virtually the same size externally. The RAV4 wins decisively on boot space. 542L vs 438L is a 104L difference that you'll notice when loading a pram, suitcases, or shopping. The CX-5 has a longer wheelbase which helps rear legroom slightly.
Cost to own
This is where the RAV4 Hybrid pulls ahead. The fuel savings compound over time, and Toyota's resale dominance means less depreciation loss.
| Annual Cost | RAV4 Hybrid | CX-5 Petrol |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel (15,000km/yr) | $1,368 | $1,995 |
| Insurance (est.) | $1,700 | $1,560 |
| Servicing | $700 | $640 |
| Tyres (amortised) | $380 | $350 |
| Registration (avg) | $750 | $750 |
| Total Annual | $4,898 | $5,295 |
The RAV4 saves $397/year in total running costs, which works out to about $1,985 over 5 years. Most of that comes from fuel, with the hybrid saving around $627/year (or $3,135 over 5 years) over the CX-5's 2.5L petrol. Combined with stronger resale ($27,000 vs $22,000 at 5 years), the RAV4 Hybrid's net 5-year cost of ownership is approximately $2,635 lower than the CX-5 Petrol, despite costing $4,500 more upfront. The resale advantage is what flips the numbers.
Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to adjust these numbers for your actual driving distance and fuel prices.
On the Road
The CX-5 is the better driver's car. Mazda's G-Vectoring Control Plus makes it feel connected and responsive through corners. The steering is weighted naturally, and the 6-speed auto is well-matched to the engine. It's genuinely enjoyable to drive.
The RAV4 Hybrid is smooth and quiet in the city. The electric motor handles low-speed driving silently. But the CVT transmission drones under hard acceleration, and the ride is firmer than the CX-5. It's competent but not engaging.
Practicality
The RAV4 wins on space: 542L boot vs 438L. That's a meaningful difference. The RAV4 can fit a large pram plus shopping, the CX-5 struggles with both. Rear legroom is similar.
The CX-5 wins on towing: 2,000kg braked vs 1,500kg. If you tow a boat or medium trailer, the CX-5 is the better choice. The RAV4 Hybrid's CVT isn't ideal for heavy towing.
Highway Efficiency
The RAV4 Hybrid's advantage shrinks at highway speeds. At 110km/h, the hybrid system provides less benefit because the petrol engine runs constantly. The gap narrows from 2.2L/100km in the city to about 1.0L/100km on the highway. Use our Speed vs Range calculator to see the exact numbers.
Resale Value
Toyota RAV4 resale is consistently 5-8% stronger than the CX-5 after 5 years. The hybrid version holds even better. Demand for used hybrids is increasing. If you buy a RAV4 Hybrid and sell at 5 years, expect to get back ~$27,000 on a $49,000 driveaway car.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the RAV4 Hybrid if: You prioritize fuel economy, boot space, resale value, and long-term running costs. You want the most rational choice.
Buy the CX-5 if: You value driving enjoyment, interior quality, towing capacity, and want a lower upfront price. You care how a car makes you feel, not just the numbers.
Key details
A tick marks the better figure only where both cars have one and the gap is meaningful (3% or more; a whole star or year).
| Detail | Toyota RAV4 | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | From $45,990 RRP | From $39,990 RRP |
| Drive-away estimate | $50,872 drive away (VIC, advertised) | Calculating... |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Powertrain | Hybrid, 2.5L 4-cyl | Petrol, 2.5L 4-cyl |
| Power / torque | 143kW / No data | 132kW / 242Nm |
| Fuel use | 4.5 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| 0-100km/h | 8.4s | 8.7s |
| Boot | 705L seats up | 466L seats up · 1,594L seats folded |
| Towing (braked) | 800kg | 1,800kg |
| ANCAP | No data | 5 stars (2025) |
| Warranty | 5yr / unlimited km | 5yr / unlimited km |
At a glance
- Seats
- 5
- Boot
- 705L seats up
- Length x width x height
- 4,600 x 1,855 x 1,685mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,690mm
- Engine
- 2.5L 4-cyl
- Power
- 143kW
- Torque
- No data
- Drive
- FWD
- Transmission
- CVT (e-CVT)
- Power-to-weight
- 82 kW/tonne
- Kerb weight
- 1,745kg
- Spare wheel
- Space saver
- Payload
- 400kg
- Towing braked / unbraked
- 800kg / 750kg
- Turning circle
- 11.36m
- Seats
- 5
- Boot
- 466L seats up · 1,594L seats folded
- Length x width x height
- 4,690 x 1,860 x 1,695mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,815mm
- Engine
- 2.5L 4-cyl
- Power
- 132kW
- Torque
- 242Nm
- Drive
- AWD
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Power-to-weight
- 77 kW/tonne
- Kerb weight
- 1,720kg
- Spare wheel
- T155/80R17 temporary
- Payload
- 517kg
- Towing braked / unbraked
- 1,800kg / 750kg
- Turning circle
- 11.2m
CarSorted Score breakdown
The CarSorted Score is algorithmic: it is calculated from each car's data, not from a road test. How it works.
Safety
Fuel Economy
Value
Practicality
Technology
Performance
Reliability
The verdict
Toyota RAV4 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (70 vs 67)
The deciding gaps
- Fuel Economy:Toyota RAV4 95, Mazda CX-5 69, Toyota RAV4 ahead by 26
- Safety:Toyota RAV4 62, Mazda CX-5 76, Mazda CX-5 ahead by 14
- Technology:Toyota RAV4 57, Mazda CX-5 43, Toyota RAV4 ahead by 14
The Toyota RAV4 wins on the score; the Mazda CX-5 is the cheaper of the two, and price is already part of the Value axis.
Same scorer as the live comparison of these two exact cars.
Our take (written 3 April 2026)
The RAV4 Hybrid wins this comparison on the strength of its fuel economy and resale value, saving roughly $2,635 over 5 years of ownership compared to the CX-5. The fuel savings alone are about $3,135 over that period, while Toyota's stronger resale offsets the higher upfront price. But if you prioritize driving enjoyment, interior quality, and towing capacity, the CX-5 is the better car to live with daily. Neither is a wrong choice; they're both excellent SUVs.
Prices on this page move. Want the next verdict?
One short email when prices shift or a new comparison lands. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Questions buyers ask
Which is cheaper, the Toyota RAV4 or the Mazda CX-5?
The Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD is from $45,990 RRP; the Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD is from $39,990 RRP. That makes the Mazda CX-5 $6,000 cheaper.
Which is cheaper to run, the Toyota RAV4 or the Mazda CX-5?
On the official combined cycle, the Toyota RAV4 uses 4.5 L/100km and the Mazda CX-5 uses 7.4 L/100km.
What are the ANCAP ratings for the Toyota RAV4 and Mazda CX-5?
We have no ANCAP rating on record for the Toyota RAV4, and the Mazda CX-5 holds 5 stars (rated 2025).
Which has the bigger boot?
Boot space with the seats up: the Toyota RAV4 at 705L, against 466L for the Mazda CX-5.
Which tows more?
Braked towing capacity: the Mazda CX-5 at 1,800kg, against 800kg for the Toyota RAV4.
Which has the better warranty?
The Toyota RAV4 comes with a 5yr / unlimited km warranty; the Mazda CX-5 with a 5yr / unlimited km warranty.
Which comes out ahead overall?
On the CarSorted Score the Toyota RAV4 comes out ahead (Toyota RAV4 70/100, Mazda CX-5 67/100), mainly on fuel economy, technology. The score is algorithmic; the editorial above says who each car suits.
Related
Compare
In the news
- VFACTS August 2026: EVs Outsell Petrol, Diesel and Hybrid for the First Time in Australian History
- VFACTS July 2026: Best July On Record, Toyota RAV4 Back On Top, and Half the Top 10 Now Built in China
- Toyota RAV4 PHEV grades explained, plus the GXL plug-in hybrid due in 2027
- Mazda CX-5, BMW X3, MG S6 EV and Cupra Formentor All Score Five Stars With ANCAP
How to read this page. Prices, specs, ANCAP ratings, warranty, scores and the computed verdict come from our records for the two variants shown, sourced from manufacturer Australian documents, and update when those records change. RRP excludes on-road costs. Drive-away figures are estimates for the state you have selected unless marked as advertised. The editorial text was written on 3 April 2026. Always confirm price and specification with the manufacturer or dealer before you buy. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!