CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 500e vs Volvo ES90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 500e vs Volvo ES90

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthVolvo
Price (RRP)$60,500$88,880
Range (WLTP)253km554km
Battery42 kWh92 kWh
Power113kW245kW
0-100 km/h7s6.9s
Max DC Charge85kW300kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min22 min
Boot Space185L424L
Towing2,400kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 500e starts from $60,500 before on-road costs, while the Volvo ES90 opens at $88,880. That makes the Abarth 500e the more affordable entry point by $28,380.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,550 and $97,768 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

The Volvo ES90 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Abarth 500e.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volvo ES90 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Abarth 500e.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Abarth 500e and 9 in the Volvo ES90. The Volvo ES90 adds a 360-degree camera that the Abarth 500e misses.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 500e features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volvo ES90 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 500e stands out with JBL audio that you will not find on the Volvo ES90. The Volvo ES90 counters with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 500e gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo ES90 offers nordico fabric. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 500e and 4-zone in the Volvo ES90.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 500e uses a Electric producing 113kW and 235Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 responds with a Electric making 245kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo ES90 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 42kWh (Abarth 500e) vs 92kWh (Volvo ES90), giving WLTP ranges of 253km and 554km. DC fast charging peaks at 85kW (Abarth 500e) vs 300kW (Volvo ES90).

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 500e measures 3,673mm long on a 2,322mm wheelbase, 1327mm shorter than the Volvo ES90 at 5,000mm (3,102mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo ES90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 500e and 424L in the Volvo ES90, giving the Volvo ES90 a 239L advantage. The Volvo ES90 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 11.8m

Abarth 500e Scorpionissima
9.4mTighter
Best
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
11.8m
Worst
Abarth 500e
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo ES90
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 500e) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo ES90). The Volvo ES90 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 500e if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo ES90 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo ES90 takes 10 of 11 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Volvo ES90 has a clear edge. The Volvo ES90 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 500e and Volvo ES90?

The Abarth 500e is the cheapest at $60,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo ES90 by $28,380.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Volvo ES90 has the most range at 554km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Volvo ES90 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 300kW.

Which is safest?

The Volvo ES90 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo ES90 has the largest boot at 424L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo ES90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,400kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Volvo ES90 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo ES90 makes the most power at 245kW. The Volvo ES90 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.9s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · All Liftbacks