CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Giulia vs BMW M3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs BMW M3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoBMW
Price (RRP)$76,450$163,700
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power206kW353kW
0-100 km/h5.2s4.2s
Fuel Economy6.1 L/100km10.1 L/100km
Boot Space480L480L
Towing1,600kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Alfa Romeo Giulia & BMW M3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Giulia starts from $76,450 before on-road costs, while the BMW M3 opens at $163,700. That makes the Alfa Romeo Giulia the more affordable entry point by $87,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,095 and $180,070 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Alfa Romeo Giulia by roughly $5,700 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Giulia features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BMW M3 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW M3 counters with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate that the Alfa Romeo Giulia does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Alfa Romeo Giulia gets leather upholstery while the BMW M3 offers merino leather.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Giulia uses a Petrol producing 206kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.2 seconds.

The BMW M3 responds with a Petrol making 353kW and 550Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.2 seconds.

The BMW M3 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 206kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW M3 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Giulia measures 4,643mm long on a 2,820mm wheelbase, 158mm shorter than the BMW M3 at 4,801mm (2,857mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 480L in the Alfa Romeo Giulia and 480L in the BMW M3.

For towing, the BMW M3 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

TightestBMW M3 Sedan ManualTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW M3 Sedan Manual
11.0mTighter
Best
Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce RWD
11.6m
Worst
Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce RWD
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW M3 Sedan Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW M3Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Alfa Romeo Giulia11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
BMW M3Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,739/year for the Alfa Romeo Giulia and $2,879/year for the BMW M3. That is a $1,140 annual difference in favour of the Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Estimated annual total: $1,739 (Alfa Romeo Giulia) vs $2,879 (BMW M3). The Alfa Romeo Giulia saves you roughly $1,140 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Giulia) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M3). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Giulia if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW M3 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M3 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Alfa Romeo Giulia will save you roughly $1,140 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Giulia and BMW M3?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia is the cheapest at $76,450 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW M3 by $87,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Alfa Romeo Giulia and BMW M3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M3 makes the most power at 353kW. The BMW M3 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.2s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars