Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Skoda Octavia
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Alfa Romeo Giulia
From $76,450
Sedan
Petrol
Petrol
206kW
6.1 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
480L
Skoda Octavia
From $39,990
Sedan
Petrol
Petrol
110kW
5.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
600L
Track the Alfa Romeo Giulia & Skoda Octavia
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Alfa Romeo Giulia starts from $76,450 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Octavia opens at $39,990. That makes the Skoda Octavia the more affordable entry point by $36,460.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,095 and $43,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Alfa Romeo Giulia features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Octavia gets a 13-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Octavia. The Skoda Octavia counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Alfa Romeo Giulia gets leather upholstery while the Skoda Octavia offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Alfa Romeo Giulia uses a Petrol producing 206kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.2 seconds.
The Skoda Octavia responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia has the clear power advantage at 206kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is 3.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Alfa Romeo Giulia measures 4,643mm long on a 2,820mm wheelbase, 55mm shorter than the Skoda Octavia at 4,698mm (2,686mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Alfa Romeo Giulia generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 480L in the Alfa Romeo Giulia and 600L in the Skoda Octavia, giving the Skoda Octavia a 120L advantage.
For towing, the Alfa Romeo Giulia leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,739/year for the Alfa Romeo Giulia and $1,625/year for the Skoda Octavia. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Octavia.
Estimated annual total: $1,739 (Alfa Romeo Giulia) vs $1,625 (Skoda Octavia). The Skoda Octavia saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Giulia) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Octavia). The Skoda Octavia has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Alfa Romeo Giulia if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Octavia if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Octavia takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Octavia will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Octavia has a clear edge. The Skoda Octavia adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Giulia and Skoda Octavia?
The Skoda Octavia is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Alfa Romeo Giulia by $36,460.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Octavia uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Skoda Octavia all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Octavia has the largest boot at 600L.
Which can tow the most?
The Alfa Romeo Giulia has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Octavia has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Alfa Romeo Giulia makes the most power at 206kW. The Alfa Romeo Giulia is quickest to 100km/h in 5.2s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
