CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Giulia vs Volvo ES90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Volvo ES90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoVolvo
Price (RRP)$76,450$88,880
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)554km
Battery92 kWh
Power206kW245kW
0-100 km/h5.2s6.6s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time22 min
Fuel Economy6.1 L/100km
Boot Space480L424L
Towing1,600kg1,600kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Alfa Romeo Giulia & Volvo ES90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Giulia starts from $76,450 before on-road costs, while the Volvo ES90 opens at $88,880. That makes the Alfa Romeo Giulia the more affordable entry point by $12,430.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,095 and $97,768 respectively.

The Volvo ES90 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Alfa Romeo Giulia, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

107kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 43m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

21 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Giulia features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo ES90 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo ES90 counters with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate that the Alfa Romeo Giulia does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Alfa Romeo Giulia gets leather upholstery while the Volvo ES90 offers nordico fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the Alfa Romeo Giulia and 4-zone in the Volvo ES90.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Giulia uses a Petrol producing 206kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.2 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 responds with a Electric making 245kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.

The Volvo ES90 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 206kW. In the real-world sprint, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Giulia measures 4,643mm long on a 2,820mm wheelbase, 357mm shorter than the Volvo ES90 at 5,000mm (3,102mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo ES90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 480L in the Alfa Romeo Giulia and 424L in the Volvo ES90, giving the Alfa Romeo Giulia a 56L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo ES90 leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.0m

TightestAlfa Romeo Giulia Veloce RWDTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce RWD
11.6mTighter
Best
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m
Worst
Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce RWD
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo ES90 Plus Single Motor
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAlfa Romeo GiuliaTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Alfa Romeo GiuliaTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo ES9012.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Giulia) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo ES90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Giulia if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo ES90 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Alfa Romeo Giulia takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Alfa Romeo Giulia has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Giulia and Volvo ES90?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia is the cheapest at $76,450 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo ES90 by $12,430.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Alfa Romeo Giulia and Volvo ES90 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia has the largest boot at 480L.

Which can tow the most?

The Alfa Romeo Giulia has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo ES90 makes the most power at 245kW. The Alfa Romeo Giulia is quickest to 100km/h in 5.2s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best electric cars