CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi A3 vs Volkswagen Polo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi A3 vs Volkswagen Polo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Audi A3: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 5 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAudiVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$36,200$30,790
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power75kW85kW
0-100 km/h12s10.4s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space351L
Towing750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Audi A3 & Volkswagen Polo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi A3 starts from $36,200 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Polo opens at $30,790. That makes the Volkswagen Polo the more affordable entry point by $5,410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,820 and $33,869 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen Polo by roughly $1,855 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volkswagen Polo counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that the Audi A3 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi A3 lines up producing 75kW and 148Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch (s tronic) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.

The Volkswagen Polo responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Volkswagen Polo has the clear power advantage at 85kW vs 75kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen Polo is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Volkswagen Polo 85TSI Life
10.6m
Volkswagen Polo 85TSI Life
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Volkswagen Polo Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Audi A3 and $1,539/year for the Volkswagen Polo. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Polo.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Audi A3) vs $1,539 (Volkswagen Polo). The Volkswagen Polo saves you roughly $371 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi A3 if: You or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Polo if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen Polo takes 4 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Polo will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi A3 and Volkswagen Polo?

The Volkswagen Polo is the cheapest at $30,790 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi A3 by $5,410.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Polo uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Polo all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Polo makes the most power at 85kW. The Volkswagen Polo is quickest to 100km/h in 10.4s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars