CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Audi A3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Audi A3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthAudi
Price (RRP)$48,369$54,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW110kW
0-100 km/h6.7s8.4s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space185L380L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Abarth 695 & Audi A3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $48,369 before on-road costs, while the Audi A3 opens at $54,800. That makes the Abarth 695 the more affordable entry point by $6,431.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,206 and $60,280 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi A3 by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Abarth 695 and Audi A3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi A3 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Abarth 695.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Abarth 695 and 6 in the Audi A3.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Audi A3 gets a 10.1-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi A3 counters with heated front seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting that the Abarth 695 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Audi A3 offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 2-zone in the Audi A3.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Audi A3 responds with a Petrol MHEV making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 695 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 695mm shorter than the Audi A3 at 4,352mm (2,635mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi A3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 380L in the Audi A3, giving the Audi A3 a 195L advantage. The Audi A3 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Audi A3 35 TFSI S line Sportback
10.6m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi A3 35 TFSI S line Sportback
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $1,425/year for the Audi A3. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Audi A3.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $1,425 (Audi A3). The Audi A3 saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi A3). The Audi A3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi A3 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi A3 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Audi A3 will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi A3 has a clear edge. The Audi A3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Audi A3?

The Abarth 695 is the cheapest at $48,369 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi A3 by $6,431.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi A3 uses the least fuel at 5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Abarth 695 and Audi A3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi A3 has the largest boot at 380L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi A3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Audi A3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars