Abarth 695 vs Hyundai i20
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Abarth 695
From $37,900
Hatchback
Petrol
Turbo T-Jet
132kW
6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
185L
Hyundai i20
From $32,490
Hatchback
Petrol
SmartStream G1.6 T-GDi
150kW
6.9 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
310L
Hyundai i20: we're still completing kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h, warranty and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Abarth 695 & Hyundai i20
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai i20 opens at $32,490. That makes the Hyundai i20 the more affordable entry point by $5,410.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $35,739 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Abarth 695 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai i20 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Hyundai i20 counters with wireless charging, Bose audio and ambient lighting that the Abarth 695 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Hyundai i20 offers cloth sports seats with premium bolsters.
Drivetrain
The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The Hyundai i20 responds with a SmartStream G1.6 T-GDi making 150kW and 275Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Hyundai i20 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 132kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 418mm shorter than the Hyundai i20 at 4,075mm (2,580mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i20 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 310L in the Hyundai i20, giving the Hyundai i20 a 125L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 10.5m
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $1,967/year for the Hyundai i20. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Abarth 695.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $1,967 (Hyundai i20). The Abarth 695 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Hyundai i20 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Hyundai i20 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Abarth 695 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai i20 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Hyundai i20?
The Hyundai i20 is the cheapest at $32,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,410.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Abarth 695 and Hyundai i20 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Hyundai i20 has the largest boot at 310L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai i20 makes the most power at 150kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
