CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Citroen C3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Citroen C3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthCitroen
Price (RRP)$37,900$32,267
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW81kW
0-100 km/h6.7s10.9s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km5.2 L/100km
Boot Space185L300L
Towing450kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Abarth 695 & Citroen C3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the Citroen C3 opens at $32,267. That makes the Citroen C3 the more affordable entry point by $5,633.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $35,494 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Citroen C3 by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Citroen C3 gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Citroen C3 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Citroen C3 responds with a Petrol making 81kW and 205Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (eat) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 81kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 695 is 4.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 339mm shorter than the Citroen C3 at 3,996mm (2,539mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Citroen C3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 300L in the Citroen C3, giving the Citroen C3 a 115L advantage. The Citroen C3 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m diameter

Excellent

Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3 m Ø

Excellent

9.0 m road
Abarth 695 Turning circle · Ø 9.3 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Clears the U-turn in one swing

Needs about 8.2 m of road; you have 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.6 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $1,482/year for the Citroen C3. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Citroen C3.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $1,482 (Citroen C3). The Citroen C3 saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Citroen C3). The Citroen C3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Citroen C3 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Citroen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Citroen C3 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Citroen C3 will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Citroen C3 has a clear edge. The Citroen C3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Citroen C3?

The Citroen C3 is the cheapest at $32,267 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,633.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Citroen C3 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Abarth 695 and Citroen C3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Citroen C3 has the largest boot at 300L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Citroen C3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars