CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Kia K4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Kia K4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthKia
Price (RRP)$37,900$32,090
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW112kW
0-100 km/h6.7s9.8s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space185L438L
Towing1,100kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Abarth 695 & Kia K4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the Kia K4 opens at $32,090. That makes the Kia K4 the more affordable entry point by $5,810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $35,299 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Abarth 695 by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Kia K4. The Kia K4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Kia K4 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Kia K4 responds with a Petrol making 112kW and 192Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.8 seconds.

The Abarth 695 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 112kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 695 is 3.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 783mm shorter than the Kia K4 at 4,440mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia K4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 438L in the Kia K4, giving the Kia K4 a 253L advantage. The Kia K4 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.7m

TightestAbarth 695 CompetizioneTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Kia K4 S
10.7m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia K4 S
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAbarth 695Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Abarth 695Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Kia K410.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $2,109/year for the Kia K4. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Abarth 695.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $2,109 (Kia K4). The Abarth 695 saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia K4). The Kia K4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia K4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia K4 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Abarth 695 will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia K4 has a clear edge. The Kia K4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Kia K4?

The Kia K4 is the cheapest at $32,090 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,810.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia K4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia K4 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia K4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia K4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Abarth 695 makes the most power at 132kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars