CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi A5 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi A5 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiToyota
Price (RRP)$79,900$97,990
Power150kW227kW
0-100 km/h7.8s8.6s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space400L700L
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Audi A5 starts from $79,900 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. That makes the Audi A5 the more affordable entry point by $18,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $87,890 and $107,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi A5 by roughly $5,270 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi A5 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Audi A5 and 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi A5 packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Audi A5 and 10 in the Toyota LandCruiser 300. The Audi A5 adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota LandCruiser 300 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Audi A5 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi A5 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi A5 uses a 4-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging producing 150kW and 340Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi A5 is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi A5 measures 4,762mm long on a 2,821mm wheelbase, 218mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the Audi A5 and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 300L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.8m

Audi A5 TFSI 150 kW S line Sedan
11.4mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m
Worst
Audi A5
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Audi A5 and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $1,054 annual difference in favour of the Audi A5.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Audi A5) vs $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Audi A5 saves you roughly $1,054 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi A5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi A5 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi A5 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Audi A5 will save you roughly $1,054 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi A5 and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Audi A5 is the cheapest at $79,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 300 by $18,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi A5 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Audi A5 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW. The Audi A5 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All SUVs