CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Audi S5 vs Nissan GT-R
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi S5 vs Nissan GT-R

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Nissan GT-R: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAudiNissan
Price (RRP)$99,900$168,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power270kW390kW
0-100 km/h4.5s—
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km11.9 L/100km
Boot Space445L—
Towing1,800kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Audi S5 & Nissan GT-R

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi S5 starts from $99,900 before on-road costs, while the Nissan GT-R opens at $168,800. That makes the Audi S5 the more affordable entry point by $68,900.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $109,890 and $185,680 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi S5 by roughly $6,840 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Audi S5 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan GT-R. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi S5 uses a Petrol MHEV producing 270kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a s tronic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The Nissan GT-R responds with a Petrol making 390kW and 612Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (gvg '6 spd auto'); release: revised 'r mode' and magnesium paddle shift driving all four wheels.

The Nissan GT-R has the clear power advantage at 390kW vs 270kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Audi S5 S5 edition one Sedan
11.4m
←
Audi S5 edition one Sedan
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Audi S5 Turning circle · Ø 11.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Audi S5 and $3,392/year for the Nissan GT-R. That is a $1,368 annual difference in favour of the Audi S5.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi S5 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan GT-R if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi S5 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi S5 will save you roughly $1,368 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi S5 and Nissan GT-R?

The Audi S5 is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan GT-R by $68,900.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi S5 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Audi S5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Nissan GT-R, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi S5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan GT-R makes the most power at 390kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All Coupes · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars