CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW 4 Series vs Honda Prelude
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW 4 Series vs Honda Prelude

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWHonda
Price (RRP)$83,500$61,100
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power135kW135kW
0-100 km/h7.5s8.2s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km4.3 L/100km
Boot Space440L264L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW 4 Series & Honda Prelude

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW 4 Series starts from $83,500 before on-road costs, while the Honda Prelude opens at $61,100. That makes the Honda Prelude the more affordable entry point by $22,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,850 and $67,210 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda Prelude by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW 4 Series features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Honda Prelude gets a 9-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Honda Prelude counters with wireless charging, Bose audio and ambient lighting that the BMW 4 Series does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW 4 Series gets sensatec synthetic leather upholstery while the Honda Prelude offers leather.

Drivetrain

The BMW 4 Series uses a Petrol producing 135kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Honda Prelude responds with a Inline 4 making 135kW and 315Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the BMW 4 Series is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW 4 Series measures 4,770mm long on a 2,851mm wheelbase, 77mm longer than the Honda Prelude at 4,693mm (2,735mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 4 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BMW 4 Series and 264L in the Honda Prelude, giving the BMW 4 Series a 176L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.8m

TightestBMW 4 Series 420i CoupeTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW 4 Series 420i Coupe
11.4mTighter
Best
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m
Worst
BMW 4 Series 420i Coupe
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW 4 SeriesTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW 4 SeriesTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Honda Prelude11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the BMW 4 Series and $1,226/year for the Honda Prelude. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Honda Prelude.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (BMW 4 Series) vs $1,226 (Honda Prelude). The Honda Prelude saves you roughly $598 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 4 Series) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda Prelude). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW 4 Series if: You need more boot space, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda Prelude if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW 4 Series takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Honda Prelude will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW 4 Series has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW 4 Series and Honda Prelude?

The Honda Prelude is the cheapest at $61,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW 4 Series by $22,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda Prelude uses the least fuel at 4.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW 4 Series and Honda Prelude carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 4 Series has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW 4 Series has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars